MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2298907216 · doi:10.1161/str.43.suppl_1.a2781

Abstract 2781: Prevalence and Characterization of Cerebral Microbleeds in Lacunar Stroke Patients: Observations from the Secondary Prevention Small Subcortical Strokes (SPS3) Trial

2012· article· en· W2298907216 on OpenAlexaff
Ashkan Shoamanesh, Jeff M. Szychowski, Luciana Catanese, Oscar Benavente

Bibliographic record

VenueStroke · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicIntracerebral and Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineLacunar strokeStroke (engine)Internal medicinePopulationCohortCardiologyIschemic strokeIschemia

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: The prevalence of cerebral microbleeds (CMBs) has been reported to be high in patients with cerebrovascular disease and particularly in those with cerebral small vessel disease; i.e. lacunar strokes. However, methodological limitations of previous studies imposed by small sample sizes and the absence of a clear classification of stroke subtypes hampers the conclusions regarding prevalence and characterization of CMBs in lacunar stroke patients. Methods: SPS3 is a multi-center international randomized trial including a well-defined cohort of MRI proven lacunar stroke patients. We investigated patients within this population who had an axial T2*- GRE sequence available as part of their baseline clinical MRI. The Brain Observer MicroBleed Scale was used to rate the presence and topography of CMBs. CMB severity was graded as either absent, 1-2 CMBs or >2 CMBs. We compared baseline characteristics and vascular risk factors between patients with CMBs and those without and between the defined CMB severity grades. Results: Of the 651 MRIs analyzed, 237 (36%) had CMBs. Patients with CMBs were more often male (73% vs 62%, p<0.01) and Hispanic (49% vs 39%, p=0.02), were more likely to have hypertension (95% vs 90%, p=0.01) and prior lacunar stroke (13% vs 7%, p=0.01), and had lower baseline mean Cognitive Abilities Screening Instrument (CASI) scores (80 vs 86, p<0.01). Male gender [OR 1.85 (95% CI, 1.26 to 2.70)], prior lacunar stroke [OR 2.19 (95% CI, 1.19 to 4.03)] and lower baseline CASI scores [OR 0.97 (95% CI, 0.95 to 0.98)] remained significant following multivariate analysis. A significant association was found between increasing CMB severity and decreasing CASI scores (p<0.01), an increased presence of multiple lacunar infarcts (p<0.0001) and moderate-severe white matter hyperintensities on MRI (p<0.0001). Conclusions: Preliminary results of this large and well-defined cohort of lacunar stroke suggest a high prevalence of CMBs. A significant association was observed between CMBs and gender and a history of lacunar stroke. CMB severity was associated with multiple infarcts and severity of white matter disease on MRI, as well as lower cognitive function. Ongoing data from SPS3 will likely elucidate whether prognosis and response to therapy differ in patients with CMBs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueStrokeSame topicIntracerebral and Subarachnoid Hemorrhage ResearchFrench-language works237,207