MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2299165806 · doi:10.1111/cag.12257

What is the fracking story in Canada?

2016· article· en· W2299165806 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Andrea Olive

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Geographies / Géographies canadiennes · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicClimate Change Communication and Perception
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHydraulic fracturingIndependence (probability theory)PoliticsClimate changeEnergy independenceNatural resource economicsPolitical scienceBusinessEconomyEnvironmental planningEnvironmental protectionEnvironmental scienceEngineeringPetroleum engineeringEconomicsGeologyLawRenewable energyOceanography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Key Messages The fracking story in Canada is about water pollution, economic benefits, uncertain risks, moratoriums, and energy independence. The fracking story in Canada is not about Aboriginal politics, earthquakes, or climate change. Media coverage in Canada of hydraulic fracturing is selective and focuses on particular stories about the economy or the environment, but not both.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.014
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.148
Threshold uncertainty score0.988

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.014
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.007
Science and technology studies0.0520.014
Scholarly communication0.0170.007
Open science0.0020.005
Research integrity0.0050.013
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0200.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.080
GPT teacher head0.291
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations32
Published2016
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Geographies / Géographies canadiennesSame topicClimate Change Communication and PerceptionFrench-language works237,207