MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2299198409 · doi:10.1093/neuonc/nov234.15

STEM-15LONG NONCODING RNA REGULATION OF THE CANCER STEM CELL PHENOTYPE IN GLIOBLASTOMA MULTIFORME

2015· article· en· W2299198409 on OpenAlexaff
Uswa Shahzad, Jenny Wang, Christopher Li, Megan Wu, James T. Rutka, Sunit Das

Bibliographic record

VenueNeuro-Oncology · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCancer-related molecular mechanisms research
Canadian institutionsHospital for Sick ChildrenUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyStem cellCancer stem cellEmbryonic stem cellNeural stem cellGliomaIn silicoGene knockdownCancer researchCellular differentiationPhenotypeLong non-coding RNACell biologyRNAGeneticsCell cultureGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is the most common primary malignant brain tumor in adults, with a two-year survival rate of less than 25%. The recurrence of GBM has been attributed to the presence of glioma stem cells (GSC), which are thought to play a central role in tumor development and progression. Long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) have been suggested to play a role in maintaining pluripotency, self-renewal, and differentiation in embryonic stem cells (ESCs). We hypothesized that lncRNAs functionally contribute to GBM development and tumor propagation by maintaining the cancer stem cell phenotype in glioblastoma. Initially, an in silico “nearest-neighbor” approach was employed to identify 112 lncRNA candidates that were close to the transcription factors that have been implicated in regulating self-renewal and pluripotency of ESCs or iPSCs, as well as factors that have been used to reprogram GSCs. Based on further in silico analyses and in vitro studies, we have identified three novel long noncoding RNAs, lincSox2, lincPOU5F1, and lincCTNNB1 that show differential expression in stem vs. differentiated normal human fetal neural stem cells (NSCs) and GSCs. The expression of lincSox2 and lincPOU5F1 significantly decreased in differentiated human NSCs compared to controls, and were significantly increased in differentiated GSCs compared to control GSCs. In comparison, the expression of lincCTNNB1 was increased in all differentiated cells, compared to their corresponding stem cell controls. Further knockdown experiments followed by in vivo studies will provide insight into functional relevance of these candidates in maintaining “stemness” in GSCs. Based on in silico and in vitro studies, we have identified two novel long noncoding RNAs that show differential expression in stem vs. differentiated NSCs and GSCs, and may functionally contribute to glioma biology by regulating the cancer stem cell phenotype. However, further characterization is needed to fully understand the role of lncRNAs in glioblastoma multiforme.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.295
Teacher spread0.271 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeuro-OncologySame topicCancer-related molecular mechanisms researchFrench-language works237,207