MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2299231719 · doi:10.1149/ma2015-01/18/1280

(Invited) Conducting Polymer Transistors Making Use of Activated Carbon Gate Electrodes

2015· article· en· W2299231719 on OpenAlexaff
Hao Tang, Prajwal Kumar, Shiming Zhang, Clara Santato, Francesca Soavi, Fabio Cicoira

Bibliographic record

VenueECS Meeting Abstracts · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicConducting polymers and applications
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPEDOT:PSSElectrodeMaterials scienceBioelectronicsConductive polymerReference electrodeCapacitanceOptoelectronicsCyclic voltammetryNanotechnologyTransistorPoly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene)Working electrodeElectrochemistryPolymerLayer (electronics)Electrical engineeringBiosensorChemistryComposite materialVoltage

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The characteristics of the gate electrode have significant effects on the behaviour of organic electrochemical transistors (OECTs), which are intensively investigated for applications in the booming field of organic bioelectronics. In this work, high specific surface area activated carbon (AC) was used as gate electrode material in OECTs based on the conducting polymer poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) (PEDOT) doped with poly(styrene sulfonate) (PSS). 1 We found that the high specific capacitance of the AC gate electrodes leads to high drain-source current modulation in OECTs. Cyclic voltammetry studies, where PEDOT:PSS is used as the working electrode (WE) and AC is used as the reference electrode (RE) and counter electrode (CE), show that high double-layer capacitance and absence of Faradaic processes permit the development of stable OECTs where the channel potential is uniquely determined by the applied gate bias. The intrinsic quasi-reference characteristics of AC electrodes make unnecessary the presence of an additional reference electrode to monitor the OECT channel potential. The ease of process of AC electrodes for in plane, flexible device architectures constitutes a step forward in the search of new electrode materials for OECTs to be used in iontronics, printed electronics, bio analytical sensing, and other organic bioelectronic devices.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.789

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.106
GPT teacher head0.295
Teacher spread0.189 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueECS Meeting AbstractsSame topicConducting polymers and applicationsFrench-language works237,207