MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Role of the NF‐kB pathway in rats subjected to moderate hemorrhage

2009· article· en· W2299297531 on OpenAlexaff
Marie‐Francoise Joelle Doursout, Yang Liang, Shibani Pati, Nena Matijevic, John B. Holcomb

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicEicosanoids and Hypertension Pharmacology
Canadian institutionsPediatric Oncology Group
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVasoconstrictionHemodynamicsMedicineShock (circulatory)Mean arterial pressureHemorrhagic shockBlood volumeAnesthesiaAortaBlood pressureCardiac outputInternal medicineCardiologyHeart rate

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Mechanisms by which hemorrhagic shock leads to hemodynamic disturbances are not fully understood. Nuclear factor kB (NF‐kB) is a nuclear transcription factor that regulates expression of genes critical for the regulation of diseases. We hypothesize that NF‐kB is responsible for the hemodynamic changes associated with hemorrhagic shock in conscious rats. Under isoflurane, catheters were implanted into the aorta to record mean blood pressure (MAP) and heart rate (HR) and in the femoral vein for drug administrations. Cardiac output (CO) was recorded through Doppler flow probe. A blood volume of 2.0 ml/100 g of body weight was withdrawn over a 5‐min to induce moderate hemorrhage. Group 1 (n=6) was subjected to moderate hemorrhage only. Group 2 (n=5) was hemorrhaged in the presence of TPCK, an inhibitor of NF‐kB at 10 mg/kg sc. Our data show that hemorrhagic shock induced decreases in MAP by 30%, HR by 40% whereas CO remained unchanged. Moderate hemorrhage induced significant systemic vasoconstriction. As compared to hemorrhaged animals, TPCK restored MAP to baseline. Furthermore, moderate hemorrhage‐induced systemic vasoconstriction was significantly reduced in the presence of TPCK. Our data suggest that NF‐kB plays a major role in the hemodynamic changes induced by moderate hemorrhage. Development of NF‐kB inhibitors that will be tissue‐specific and/or isoform‐specific as therapeutic agents need to be pursued.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB JournalSame topicEicosanoids and Hypertension PharmacologyFrench-language works237,207