MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2299303035 · doi:10.1002/mop.29720

Compact bandpass filters based on linked hexagonal‐omega resonators

2016· article· en· W2299303035 on OpenAlexaff
Imene Sassi, Larbi Talbi, Khelifa Hettak

Bibliographic record

VenueMicrowave and Optical Technology Letters · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMicrowave Engineering and Waveguides
Canadian institutionsCommunications Research Centre CanadaInnovation, Science and Economic Development CanadaUniversité du Québec en Outaouais
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBand-pass filterResonatorMicrostripMicrowaveElectronic engineeringPrototype filterMaterials scienceFilter (signal processing)Hexagonal crystal systemSubstrate (aquarium)Electronic filter topologyOptoelectronicsTopology (electrical circuits)Computer scienceEngineeringElectrical engineeringFilter designTelecommunicationsChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT A novel compact bandpass filter based on linked hexagonal‐omega resonators (LHORs) is presented. The proposed filter is realized by loading the LHORs to the microstrip line on the top of the substrate. The LHORs provides the possibility of designing bandpass filters with small size and simple structure. Two prototypes of filters were designed based on this structure. To validate the proposed prototypes, two‐cascaded and three‐cascaded bandpass filters using LHORs are simulated and fabricated. The proposed filters show a good pass‐band performance and a high out‐band suppression. The good agreement between the measured and the simulated results proves the excellent performance of the proposed filters. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Microwave Opt Technol Lett 58:1049–1052, 2016

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.082
Threshold uncertainty score0.951

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.195
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMicrowave and Optical Technology LettersSame topicMicrowave Engineering and WaveguidesFrench-language works237,207