Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Settlers of the Marsh was first published in 1925 following a controversy regarding the treatment of its topic. Some critics condemned it as “obscene” and “indecent”. Churches issued warnings to their congregations to avoid its scandalous contents, only several decades later to be recognized as a landmark in the development of Canadian novel.The novel belongs to Canadian realism. It is a fiction of regional or prairie realism, dealing with cosmopolitan issues such as: love or romance, sex or sexuality, murder or homicide, twentieth century, nineteenth century, marriage, prostitution or prostitutes, rural or country life, farms, farmers, or farming, Canada or Canadians, ambition, labor, houses, mansions, or manors, frontier or pioneer life etc. In this respect, the novel presents a psychological portrait of life in Canadian West. It is a story of a young Swedish settler who comes to the “New World” to set up a new life for himself and fulfill his dreams. The story of his life, however, comprises of real difficulties a young settler in Canadian marshes faces.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it