MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2299452483 · doi:10.18815/sh.2015v5n8.104

Utilização do tempo livre na formação integral<br>Usage of free time on integral formation

2016· article· pt· W2299452483 on OpenAlexaff
Eloy Demarchi Teixeira

Bibliographic record

VenueSaber Humano · 2016
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducation Pedagogy and Practices
Canadian institutionsNexen (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhilosophyHumanitiesPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Este trabalho tem por objetivo identificar quais situações, atividades/ações e estilos de traço de vida contribuíram para o surgimento de dois gênios renascentistas: Leonardo da Vinci e Pico della Mirandola. O trabalho discorre sobre a importância do uso do tempo livre na própria formação, o nexo ontológico como fonte de criatividade e a necessidade de formalização do potencial natural em um ambiente propício para que se formalize uma inteligência superior. Serão buscados comportamentos ou situações comuns que podem evidenciar fatores que contribuem para a autodescoberta e formação de pessoas.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.499
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.003
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0310.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.074
GPT teacher head0.368
Teacher spread0.293 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSaber HumanoSame topicEducation Pedagogy and PracticesFrench-language works237,207