MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2299480320 · doi:10.14288/1.0105469

Saprophytes in the stem of living, healthy Tsuga heterophylla (Raf.) Sarg. and their role in decay resistance of the wood

2011· article· en· W2299480320 on OpenAlexaff
J. Hudak

Bibliographic record

VenuecIRcle (University of British Columbia) · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicFern and Epiphyte Biology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTsugaResistance (ecology)Western HemlockBiologyBotanyEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

It was demonstrated that the sound wood of two stems of living western hemlock, Tsuga heterophylla (Raf.) Sarg., was colonized by microorganisms, which were isolated by shaking samples of the wood in sterile distilled water. The microfloras inhibited the growth of Fomes annosus, (Fr.) Cke., and Poria monticola Murr. when added to one per cent malt agar. The test fungi were also inhibited on untreated surface sterilized wood incubated at one hundred per cent relative humidity at room temperature. Significant variation was observed, in the rate of inhibition between the sapwood and heartwood and between the various sections of the two stems investigated. A drier environment (higher agar concentration of malt agar media, and lower relative humidity with wood) resulted in a significant decrease in inhibition rate of F. annosus and P. monticola. Autoclaving the experimental material led to the loss of inhibition with both malt agar media and wood. Removal of the microorganisms from the shake solutions by Millipore filtration also resulted in loss of the inhibiting factor. The relatively drier environment did not effect the rate of growth of the test fungi on autoclaved wood and in malt agar containing the autoclaved portion of the shake solutions. Results of the experiment provide evidence that the microfloras inhabiting the sound wood were responsible for inhibition of F. annosus and. P. monticola. Furthermore, sufficient moisture level appeared necessary for maintaining the inhibiting power of these microorganisms.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.642
Threshold uncertainty score0.936

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.153
Teacher spread0.140 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuecIRcle (University of British Columbia)Same topicFern and Epiphyte BiologyFrench-language works237,207