MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2299657618 · doi:10.14288/1.0055876

Educational programs for lone parent families in the city of Vancouver

2010· article· en· W2299657618 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jean Heath

Bibliographic record

VenuecIRcle (University of British Columbia) · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicParental Involvement in Education
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSociologyGenealogyHistory

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The main purpose of this thesis was to investigate the characteristics of lone parent families and the types of educational programs available to them in the City of Vancouver. Based on the investigation, the study outlines factors underlying the ineffectiveness of some of these educational programs and offers recommendations for action. The initial phases of this study were prompted by a grant from the Continuing Education Division of the British Columbia Ministry of Education to carry out two research projects on the lone parent family in the summer of 1980. The first phase of the study consisted of the analysis of census data on lone parent families in Canada and the second phase consisted of the compilation of an annotated bibliography on the subject of the lone parent family. The results were published jointly by the Vancouver School Board and the Ministry of Education under the respective titles of Lone Parent Families in Canada and British Columbia and Lone Parent Families: A Selected and Annotated Bibliography. In subsequent phases of the study, data on educational programs for lone parent families in the City of Vancouver were collected through a series of interviews conducted with educators who were either working with lone parent families in the setting of public education institutions or in conjunction with these institutions in the calendar year of 1981-82. A set of criteria was established to define the group of programs under study and representatives from the following government ministry, public institutions, and social agencies were Interviewed for data on educational programs for lone parent families in the City of Vancouver: 1. The Ministry of Human Resources, Victoria 2. The University of British Columbia, Women Student's Office 3. Vancouver Community College, Vancouver k. Douglas College, New Westminster 5. The City of Vancouver Health Department 6. Community Centres in Vancouver a. False Creek b. Britannia Community Services Centre c. Thunderbird Neighbourhood Centre 7. Family Services of Greater Vancouver 8. Y.W.C.A., Vancouver 9. The People's Law School, Vancouver 10. Single Parent Groups, Greater Vancouver 11. Vancouver School Board, Career and Community Education Services 12. New Westminster School Board, Continuing Education, New Westminster 13. The National Council of Welfare, Ottawa Ik. Federated Anti-Poverty Group of B. C, Vancouver The effort yielded data on a variety of educational programs available to lone parent families, but only those programs which met the established criteria were included in this study. The analysis of the 1976 Census data yielded the following statistical picture of lone parent families in Canada, British Columbia, Greater Vancouver, and the City of Vancouver: [Table omitted] In the five-year intercensal period between 1971 and 1976, the total number of lone parent families in Canada increased by l7.l per cent compared to an increase of just 13.0 per cent among husband-wife families. As an indication of significance in Canadian society, one in ten families in 1976 was a lone parent family. The incidence of lone parenthood was found to be highest in urban centres with a population of 100,000 and over. A total of 685,915 children of under 18 years of age were found living in lone parent families throughout Canada in 1976, and of the total number of lone parent families 83.3 per cent were headed by women and only 16.7 per cent by men. The average lone parent family had 1.9 children, and families headed by women appeared to be larger than families headed by men. The largest group of children belonged to the age group of 6 to 14. When the socio-economic characteristics of lone parent families were analyzed, it was found that 36.1 per cent of the total parents in Canada had less than grade 9 schooling. In view of the general pervasiveness of undereducation among the group, it was not surprising to find that only 47.5 per cent of the group were employed. Among those who were employed, there was a vast discrepancy between the sexes. Only 46.7 per cent of the female lone parents were employed compared to 73.5 per cent of the male lone parents. The typical lone parent was a woman who had two children and required social assistance due to her unemployed status, her relatively low level of education, and her general susceptibility to poverty. A report released by the National Council of Welfare (1979) showed that 44 per cent of all Canada's female lone parents were poor in 1975. Educational programs for lone parents and their families were conducted at all levels of public education institutions in the City of Vancouver in the calendar year of 1981-82. Some of these institutions worked in close conjunction with community centres and social agencies in the city. The majority of the programs offered, however, succeeded in reaching only a very small percentage of the total lone parent families in the city. Various attempts by the Ministry of Education to introduce new programs met with only limited success and a number of programs were terminated due to the lack of interest on the part of lone parents and their families. Yet an examination of the needs of lone parent families and the goals of educational programs offered revealed a high degree of congruency between the two. Alternative explanations for the ineffectiveness of program were sought from theories pertaining to needs and participation patterns in adult education; and it was concluded that the failure of educational programs for lone parent families lay In a variety of factors including social and psychological barriers which hindered members of the target population from active participation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.313
Threshold uncertainty score0.630

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0070.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuecIRcle (University of British Columbia)Same topicParental Involvement in EducationFrench-language works237,207