Stochastic Optimization of Hybrid Renewable Energy Systems
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The stochastic nature of energy demand and renewable energy (RE) resources make the design of hybrid renewable energy systems as a complex problem. In this paper, an innovative stochastic optimization approach is proposed for optimal sizing of hybrid renewable energy systems (HRES) incorporating existing uncertainties in RE resources and energy load. The design problem is formulated based on multiobjective optimization framework with three objective functions including minimize total net present cost (NPC), maximize renewable energy ratio (RER), and minimize fuel emission. The reliability index named loss of load probability (LLP) is considered as a constraint with a desirable level. The Pareto front (PF) of developed multi-objective optimization problem is approximated with the help of the integration of dynamic multi-objective particle swarm optimization (DMOPSO) algorithm, simulation module, and sampling average method. Synthetic data generation approaches are applied to tackle the randomness in wind speed, solar irradiation, ambient temperature, and energy load. A building located in Canada is used as the case study to assess the performance of the developed model. Finally, the obtained PF by the stochastic optimization approach is examined against the deterministic PF using the most famous performance metrics.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".