MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2299676113 · doi:10.1115/detc2015-46181

Stochastic Optimization of Hybrid Renewable Energy Systems

2015· article· en· W2299676113 on OpenAlexaffabout
Masoud Sharafi, Tarek Y. ElMekkawy

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicEnergy and Environment Impacts
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
FundersMinistry of Science and ICT, South KoreaTaif UniversityNational Research Foundation
KeywordsRenewable energyMathematical optimizationComputer scienceStochastic optimizationSizingParticle swarm optimizationMulti-objective optimizationOptimization problemRandomnessWind powerStochastic programmingReliability (semiconductor)EngineeringMathematicsPower (physics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The stochastic nature of energy demand and renewable energy (RE) resources make the design of hybrid renewable energy systems as a complex problem. In this paper, an innovative stochastic optimization approach is proposed for optimal sizing of hybrid renewable energy systems (HRES) incorporating existing uncertainties in RE resources and energy load. The design problem is formulated based on multiobjective optimization framework with three objective functions including minimize total net present cost (NPC), maximize renewable energy ratio (RER), and minimize fuel emission. The reliability index named loss of load probability (LLP) is considered as a constraint with a desirable level. The Pareto front (PF) of developed multi-objective optimization problem is approximated with the help of the integration of dynamic multi-objective particle swarm optimization (DMOPSO) algorithm, simulation module, and sampling average method. Synthetic data generation approaches are applied to tackle the randomness in wind speed, solar irradiation, ambient temperature, and energy load. A building located in Canada is used as the case study to assess the performance of the developed model. Finally, the obtained PF by the stochastic optimization approach is examined against the deterministic PF using the most famous performance metrics.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.964
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.193
Teacher spread0.178 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicEnergy and Environment ImpactsFrench-language works237,207