MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2299725676

An exploratory study of workplace supports among Canadian health care employees.

2003· article· en· W2299725676 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueDeep Blue (University of Michigan) · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicWorkplace Health and Well-being
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsExploratory researchHealth careBusinessNursingPsychologyMedicineSociologyPolitical science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A recent Canadian study conducted by Duxbury and Higgins (2002) revealed employees struggling to meet work and family responsibilities are costing businesses 3 billion dollars a year in lost time. Simultaneously, the stress associated with balancing work and family life is costing the health care system 425 million dollars a year due to health related problems. In spite of increasing attention being directed to the problem of work-family conflict there is a dearth of research linking organizational support practices to actual outcomes related to work-family conflict. The purpose of this study was to identify how employees' perceptions of organizational and supervisor support, and utilization of organizational supports influenced work-family conflict, sense of control, general well-being, propensity to leave one's place of employment, and absenteeism. A cross-sectional descriptive correlational survey was used that incorporated structured and open-ended questions. The convenience sample of 92 participants was drawn from a mid-size public health agency with 150 employees, that serves a community of 350,000 people. Flexible work hours, family emergency days off, unpaid leave of absence, personal days with pay, time off in lieu of overtime, short-term family/personal leave and employee assistance program were the supports most widely used by the study participants. Use of flexible work hours was significantly related to reports of greater general well being, while family emergency days off was significantly related to greater sense of control and higher work-family conflict. Bivariate analyses revealed both supervisor support and organizational support were significantly related to propensity to leave however multivariate analyses revealed only organizational support was significantly related to the employee's propensity to leave. Utilization of support and work-family conflict were found to be significantly related to employees' absenteeism. These findings suggest employees who are experiencing work-family conflict benefit from the availability of workplace supports while employers benefit from the decreased propensity to leave associated with supportive workplaces.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.852
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.287
Teacher spread0.273 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it