MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2299830669 · doi:10.2140/memocs.2015.3.365

A crack with surface elasticity in finite plane elastostatics

2015· article· en· W2299830669 on OpenAlexafffund
Xu Wang, Peter Schiavone

Bibliographic record

VenueMathematics and Mechanics of Complex Systems · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicComposite Material Mechanics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersOtto von Guericke University MagdeburgNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaUniversität Duisburg-EssenFreie Universität BerlinBilkent ÜniversitesiCentre National de la Recherche ScientifiqueUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel HillUniversität zu KölnUniversità degli Studi di PaviaAkademie Věd České RepublikyUniversité de LyonUniversität WienMcGill UniversityUniversidad Rey Juan CarlosLouisiana State UniversityUniversity of PittsburghNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaIndian National Science AcademyCarnegie Mellon UniversityWayne State UniversityVanderbilt University
KeywordsElasticity (physics)Materials scienceMechanicsMathematicsPhysicsComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We consider the effect of surface elasticity on a finite crack in a particular class of compressible hyperelastic materials of harmonic type subjected to uniform remote Piola stresses. The surface mechanics is incorporated into the model of finite deformation by employing a version of the continuum-based surface/interface theory of Gurtin and Murdoch. A complete solution valid throughout the entire domain of interest is obtained by reducing the problem to two series of coupled Cauchy singular integrodifferential equations that are solved numerically using a collocation method. Our model predicts that, in general, the size-dependent Piola stresses exhibit a weak logarithmic singularity at the crack tips. For a crack in a special class of materials subjected to mode II loading, the stresses are bounded whereas the deformation gradients exhibit a logarithmic-type singularity at the crack tips.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.183 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMathematics and Mechanics of Complex SystemsSame topicComposite Material MechanicsFrench-language works237,207