Bibliographic record
Abstract
Musica, a monthly music journal, was published in Paris by Pierre Lafitte from 1902 to 1914. The journal was exceptional for its use of iconography which supplemented the writings by numerous composers, performers, and critics of the day. It contains contributions by such well-known composers as Saint-Saens, Massenet, Bruneau, d'Indy, Faure, Debussy, and Messager. Performers to contribute articles included famed opera singers, cafe-concert celebrities, pianists, violinists, cellists, harpists, and dancers. Other articles were written by critics and professional journalists, many of whom contributed to a number of music periodicals. Among these are Henri de Curzon, Gabriel Prod'homme, M. D. Calvocoressi, Emile Vuillermoz, Michel-Gaston Carraud, and Adolphe Jullien. Much criticism was also written by Musica's editors Charles Joly, Georges Pioch, and the composer-critic Xavier Leroux. With its original material by composers, performers and critics, Musica emerges as a important source of information for the historian. Articles by composers deal with their lives, works, and contemporaries. Accounts by personal friends, acquaintances or relatives of composers provide further data on important figures such as Rossini, Adam, Franck, Reyer, Massenet, and Saint-Saens. Performance practises of the time are described by performers. Opera singers focused on character interpretation, and cafe-concert celebrities revealed their individual approaches to chanson. Proper technique is discussed by instrumentalists and illustrated in numerous photographs. Musica's iconography is also useful in determining contemporary costuming and staging in opera and ballet. Critical reviews supply the historian with descriptions of programs, performers, and concert locations. They also give an indication of the musical preferences of the era and public response to new compostions. This thesis is divided into five chapters delienated as follows. The first chapter introduces Musica and justifies a study of this periodical. Chapter two describes the journal's format and deals with the publisher. Chapter three focuses on Musica's contributors including editors, music critics, composers and performers. It also includes a discussion of articles written about composers and performers, complemented by relevant iconography. The final chapter demonstrates the relevance of Musica as a documentary source for the historian.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.031 | 0.006 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".