Le traitement jurisprudentiel du trafic de migrants en droit comparé: Un désaveu des dispositions législativescanadiennes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Sommaire Le durcissement des politiques migratoires a diminué les possibilités légales de migration, créant ainsi un environnement propice au trafic de migrants. En 2002, le Canada a drastiquement augmenté les pénalités associées à ce phénomène. Ces dispositions sont inadéquates: elles cherchent moins à réprimer une activité criminelle présumée dangereuse qu’à dissuader l’immigration irrégulière. D’une part, les dispositions législatives s’inscrivent en faux avec le traitement jurisprudentiel du trafic de migrants au Canada, et ne correspondent ni aux lois ni à la jurisprudence étrangères: on surestime la gravité du crime. D’autre part, elles ne se conforment pas au droit international. En excluant la recherche d’un avantage financier de la 'définition canadienne de l’infraction, on privilégie la lutte à toute forme d’aide à la migration irrégulière, et non seulement au trafic de migrants.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".