MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2300044327 · doi:10.1055/s-0038-1626251

Fratura múltipla da coluna cervical em segmentos não-adjacentes: Relato de caso

2004· article· pt· W2300044327 on OpenAlexaff
Marcelo Ferraz de Campos, Sérgio Henrique do Amaral, Marcelo Barletta Viterbo, Marcos Gregorini, Luis Fernando Haikel Júnior, José Carlos Rodrigues Júnior, Sérgio Listik, Clemente Augusto de Brito Pereira, Jozias de Andrade Sobrinho

Bibliographic record

VenueArquivos Brasileiros de Neurocirurgia Brazilian Neurosurgery · 2004
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldMedicine
TopicSpinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques
Canadian institutionsSmiths Detection (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCervical spineAnatomyNuclear medicineSurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Resumo Relata-se um caso de fratura múltipla da coluna cervical em segmentos não-adjacentes. A radiografia da coluna cervical apresentava fratura dos corpos vertebrais de C4 e C6 e a ressonância magnética revelou edema medular do segmento de C4 a C6 com ruptura do ligamento longitudinal posterior entre C6 e C7, sem compressão medular. Realizou-se artrodese com enxerto ósseo autólogo de crista ilíaca e fixação com placa e parafusos nos segmentos C3-C4 e C6-C7. O paciente evoluiu sem deformidade e com melhora do déficit neurológico. A artrodese com enxerto ósseo autólogo, pela técnica de Smith-Robinson, e fixação com place e parafuso podem ser eficazes no tratamento das fraturas múltiplas da coluna cervical em segmentos não-adjacentes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.003
Science and technology studies0.0040.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0040.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.287
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueArquivos Brasileiros de Neurocirurgia Brazilian NeurosurgerySame topicSpinal Fractures and Fixation TechniquesFrench-language works237,207