MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2300184272 · doi:10.2172/1095437

Atmospheric Aerosol Chemistry, Climate Change, and Air Quality: An EMSL Science Theme Advisory Panel Workshop

2013· report· en· W2300184272 on OpenAlexaff
Donald R. Baer, Barbara J. Finlayson‐Pitts, Heather C. Allen, Allan K. Bertram, Vicki H. Grassian, Scot T. Martin, Joyce E. Penner, Kimberly A. Prather, Philip J. Rasch, Ruth Signorell, James N. Smith, Barbara E. Wyslouzil, Paul J. Ziemann, Donald Dabdub, Filipp Furche, Sergey A. Nizkorodov, Douglas J. Tobias, Julia Laskin, Alexander Laskin

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typereport
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicAtmospheric chemistry and aerosols
Canadian institutionsBritish Columbia Institute of TechnologyUniversity of British Columbia
FundersBiological and Environmental ResearchU.S. Department of Energy
KeywordsScope (computer science)Theme (computing)AerosolClimate changeAir quality indexAtmospheric chemistryField (mathematics)Environmental scienceMeteorologyNanotechnologyData scienceComputer scienceGeographyMaterials scienceEcologyWorld Wide Web

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This report contains the workshop scope and recommendations from the workshop attendees in identifying scientific gaps in new particle formation, growth and properties of particles and reactions in and on particles as well as the laboratory-focused capabilities, field-deployable capabilities and modeling/theory tools along with linking of models to fundamental data.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.016
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.024
Threshold uncertainty score0.084

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0160.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0020.005
Research integrity0.0060.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0240.013

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.099
GPT teacher head0.296
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAtmospheric chemistry and aerosols→French-language works237,207→