К вопросу об использовании полимерных материалов в строительстве подземных сооружений
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The aim of the research was to develop a combined lining that would ensure long-term operation of underground workings in the chemical attack and high pressure groundwater. The problem of protection of groundwater is of particular importance for the mountain enterprises engaged in production of potash. Over the past 100 years in the world (Germany, Canada, Russia, and others.) Were flooded, more than 80 potash mines, including in Russia mines BKRU-3 (1986) and BKRU-1 (2006) Verkhnekamskoye occurrence. The most commonly used lining of iron tubing does not provide the desired water resistance and durability. Disadvantages of steel lining supports identified based on the analysis of the experience of their application in Russia and abroad. The authors proposed a combination lining which consists of several layers of concrete or reinforced concrete and a waterproof layer of fiberglass. High strength, resistance to aggressive environments, the ability to provide complete waterproofing under relatively high cost of determining the benefits of the proposed lining. Calculations have shown that under certain conditions, the proposed construction of lining can effectively replace expensive cast-iron lining and steel lining.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.010 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it