Evaluation of rubber influence on cracking resistance of crumb rubber modified binders with wax additives
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cracking properties of crumb rubber modified (CRM) asphalt binders containing wax additive were evaluated through the dynamic shear rheometer test at 25 °C and the bending beam rheometer test at −12 °C. The CRM binders were produced using three rubber contents of 5%, 10%, and 15% by the binder weight, and then mixed with two commercial wax additives of LEADCAP and Sasobit. Three states of original, short-term and long-term aging were applied to evaluate the cracking properties using rolling thin film oven and pressure aging vessel. From the results, it is concluded that (1) the increase of rubber content significantly decreases the binder stiffness at lower temperature, (2) the higher the rubber content, the lower the G*sinδ of CRM binders with wax additives at intermediate temperature, and (3) the rubber can be used to improve the cracking resistance of asphalt binders modified with wax.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".