MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

P17.09 Cost-effectiveness of hiv self-testing promotion through grindr™, a smartphone social networking application

2015· article· en· W2300547058 on OpenAlexaff
Emily Huang, RW Marlin, Alexandra Medline, SD Young, Joseph Daniels, JD Klausner

Bibliographic record

VenueSexually Transmitted Infections · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicData-Driven Disease Surveillance
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersNational Health and Medical Research CouncilAustralian Government
KeywordsMedicineTest (biology)Promotion (chess)Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)Men who have sex with menmHealthFamily medicineHealth promotionCost effectivenessGerontologyPublic healthNursingPsychological intervention

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<h3>Introduction</h3> Currently, the cost per new HIV diagnosis in the United States is estimated at $17,700. HIV self-testing promotion through smartphone social networking applications (apps) might present an affordable way to help improve case finding. We evaluated the cost-effectiveness of an HIV self-testing program that linked geo-targeted mobile advertisements to an online self-test request system. <h3>Methods</h3> The HIV self-testing program was offered in Los Angeles from April 17 to May 29, 2014, and from October 13 to November 11, 2014. During those periods, we placed advertisements for free HIV self-tests on Grindr™, a smartphone geosocial networking app popular with men who have sex with men (MSM). Users were linked to http://freehivselftests.weebly.com/to submit self-test requests. African American and Latino MSM ≥18 years old were asked if they used the self-test and what the result of the self-test was. Cost-effectiveness was measured by the cost per person tested and the cost per new case of HIV identified. <h3>Results</h3> Through the two offerings of the program, an estimated 455 users received and used an HIV self-test. Among 112 (63%) survey respondents of 178 invited, study-eligible participants who self-identified as not being previously diagnosed with HIV, 4 (4%) reported testing HIV positive; all 4 (100%) sought medical care. The total direct costs of the program incurred from two waves of advertising (US$2,670), self-test purchases &nbsp;(US$13,130 at US$26 per test), and personnel time (US$1,800) was US$17,600. The cost per person tested was US$39, and the cost per new case of HIV identified was US$4,400. <h3>Conclusion</h3> Free HIV self-testing promotion through Grindr™ is an effective and affordable means of identifying previously undiagnosed cases of HIV among African American and Latino MSM. Future work should compare advertising on different smartphone social networking apps and evaluate methods to confirm self-reported HIV test results and linkage-to-care activities. <h3>Disclosure of interest statement</h3> The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.185
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.057
GPT teacher head0.321
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSexually Transmitted InfectionsSame topicData-Driven Disease SurveillanceFrench-language works237,207