MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2300579955 · doi:10.33137/rr.v30i2.9577

Of Solitude, Skepticism, and Subjectivity: Michel de Montaigne's <i>poêle</i> in La Villa

2006· article· fr· W2300579955 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Scott D. Juall

Bibliographic record

VenueRenaissance and Reformation · 2006
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicFrench Literature and Criticism
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesSolitudePhilosophySkepticismArtTheologyLiterature

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cet article examine les expériences de solitude de Michel de Montaigne aux bains de La Villa dépeintes dans le Journal de voyage en Italie (1580-1581), ouvrage autobiographique portant en grande partie sur les épreuves de l'écrivain devenu voyageur en essayant de se guérir d'un cas sérieux et chronique de calculs rénaux. Les remèdes futiles que Montaigne cherche sans cesse pendant ses séjours à La Villa et les effets sur son esprit qui en résultent jouent un rôle d'une importance capitale dans le développement de sa conception du scepticisme à l'égard de la médecine, préalablement décrit dans les essais "Apologie de Raimond Sebond" (II, 12) et surtout "De la ressemblance des enfants aux peres" (II, 37). Cette analyse, qui procède donc d'un point de vue philosophique ainsi que littéraire, considère en particulier le rôle du rapport entre la solitude, le scepticisme à l'égard de la médecine - ancienne aussi bien que contemporaine - , l'empirisme, et l'ontologie de Montaigne dans l'établissement de la subjectivité proto-, voire méta-cartésienne, au seuil de la modernité.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.061

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0150.039
Scholarly communication0.0090.005
Open science0.0010.006
Research integrity0.0050.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.208
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRenaissance and ReformationSame topicFrench Literature and CriticismFrench-language works237,207