MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2300682580 · doi:10.1186/s40697-016-0104-y

Parental Attitudes to Genetic Testing Differ by Ethnicity and Immigration in Childhood Nephrotic Syndrome: A Cross-Sectional Study

2016· article· en· W2300682580 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Karlota Borges, Jovanka Vasilevska‐Ristovska, Neesha Hussain‐Shamsy, Viral Patel, Tonny Banh, Diane Hébert, Rachel Pearl, Seetha Radhakrishnan, Tino D. Piscione, Christoph Licht, Valérie S. Langlois, Leo Levin, Lisa J. Strug, Rulan S. Parekh

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Kidney Health and Disease · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRenal Diseases and Glomerulopathies
Canadian institutionsPublic Health OntarioUniversity of TorontoInstitute for Clinical Evaluative SciencesSickKids FoundationHospital for Sick Children
FundersHospital for Sick ChildrenPhysicians' Services Incorporated Foundation
KeywordsMedicineEthnic groupOdds ratioDemographyCross-sectional studyGenetic testingImmigrationPopulationLogistic regressionCohort studyPediatricsEnvironmental healthInternal medicinePathologyGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Studies in the USA report differences in opinion among parents of different ethnic groups toward genetic testing for their child; however, there are no studies that address this issue in the diverse ethnic and immigrant population in Canada. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to determine whether ethnicity and immigration status influences parental interest in clinical genetic testing for a potentially progressive kidney disease. DESIGN: This is a cross-sectional study. SETTING: Participants were recruited from the Greater Toronto Area, Canada. PARTICIPANTS: The study included 320 parents of children ages 1-18 years with nephrotic syndrome enrolled in the Insight into Nephrotic Syndrome: Investigating Genes, Health and Therapeutics (INSIGHT) observational cohort study. MEASUREMENTS: Demographic, ethnicity, immigration, and child specific factors as well as interest in genetic testing were collected through self-reported questionnaires administered at baseline study visit. METHODS: Logistic regression models were used to examine association of ethnicity and immigration status with interest in genetic testing. RESULTS: The majority of parents (85 %) were interested in genetic testing for their child. South Asian and East/Southeast Asian parents had 74 and 76 % lower odds of agreeing to genetic testing when compared to Europeans (odds ratio (OR) 0.26, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.10-0.68; OR 0.24, 95 % CI 0.07-0.79, respectively) after controlling for age and sex of child, age and education level of parent, initial steroid resistance, and duration of time in Canada. Immigrants to Canada also had significantly lower odds (OR 0.29, 95 % CI 0.12-0.72) of agreeing to genetic testing after similar adjustment. Higher education level was not associated with greater interest in genetic testing (OR 1.24, 95 % CI 0.64-2.42). LIMITATIONS: Participants have already agreed to aggregate genetic testing for research purposes as part of enrolment in INSIGHT study. CONCLUSION: While majority of parents were interested in genetic testing for their child, immigrants, particularly South Asians and East/Southeast Asians, were more likely to decline genetic testing. Genetic counseling needs to be tailored to address specific concerns in these parental groups to maximize informed decision-making in the clinical setting. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01605266.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.024
Threshold uncertainty score0.047

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.296
Teacher spread0.279 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2016
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Kidney Health and DiseaseSame topicRenal Diseases and GlomerulopathiesFrench-language works237,207