Sharing Environmental Responsibility in Southeast Mexico: Participatory Processes for Natural Resource Management
Bibliographic record
Abstract
"According to Mexican legislation 'the federal government must promote the co-responsible participation of society in... environmental policy and natural resources.' (Art. 157, DOF 1988). In recent years various participatory processes have been initiated where natural resource management is shared between government and civil society. This research unites the perspectives of people involved in three processes: the Grijalva- Usumacinta Watershed Council for freshwater resources, the Consultative Council on Sustainable Development for environmental policy and the Consultative Council for Terminos Lagoon for protected area conservation. Thirty-five people were interviewed in order to understand how participation works in practice, to prompt participants to reflect on their experiences, and to identify opportunities for mutual learning amongst the processes studied. \n \n "For each of the processes studied, this report provides a description of the problems faced; the process origin, purpose and structure; and a summary of participant perspectives. These processes are not perfect; yet they are a potentially more equitably alternative for dealing with the multiple pressure on natural resource use. This report identifies opportunities to improve each process and move towards more sustainable development that benefits all of Mexican society. In general, five steps for fostering a culture of participation are: (1) create a common commitment amongst different levels of government, (2) consider stakeholder motivations, (3) foster discussion on the purpose of participation, (4) create horizontal structures, and (5) establish mechanisms to ensure transparency and representation. \n \n "The existence of these processes is part of a new culture of participation that is emerging where citizens take an active role in what was previously the exclusive responsibility of government. Although government continues to administer these resources in the name of the public, civil society is an increasingly co-responsible partner in the stewardship and conservation of the country's natural resources."
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.015 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.010 | 0.009 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.007 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".