MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2300888000 · doi:10.1353/bkb.2016.0052

Claudia Rueda: Illustrator – Colombia

2016· article· en· W2300888000 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Anna Maria Czernow

Bibliographic record

VenueBookbird/Book bird · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicLiteracy and Educational Practices
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCuriosityPeriod (music)NarrativeArtVisual artsWonderArt historyLiteraturePsychologyAesthetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Claudia RuedaIllustrator – Colombia Anna Maria Czernow Click for larger view View full resolution To write and illustrate for children is a challenge that makes us better as human beings. Rueda C. curiosity and playfulness—this is how Claudia Rueda, a Colombian illustrator and picture-book author, defines childhood. No wonder critics claim that these features dominate in her works for children. Before Rueda turned to books for young readers, she was known as an author of political cartoons, published in Colombian press in the period of drug and guerilla wars. In order to obtain a Master’s degree from a law school, which she attended concurrently with an art school at National University of Colombia, she submitted an illustrated thesis titled Graphic History of the Roman Law. When studying computer graphics at the University of California, Berkeley, she attended a children’s books illustration course and ever since has found fulfilment as an artist creating for young readers. Claudia Rueda has authored over twenty children’s books, both fiction and non-fiction—for example, No, a compendium about black bears. In her artistic work, she uses a variety of techniques, such as charcoal and ink drawing or computer graphics, but her favorite is colored pencil drawing. Rueda is particularly interested in the interpretative tension between illustration and text, which she often uses to add another dimension to the narrative. In her picture book Anaconda, a tale about a mouse which questions the existence of the snake in the title, the text tells a different story from that shown in the illustrations. Another characteristic feature of Rueda’s creative output is open endings, inspired by Eastern philosophy. Claudia Rueda has been awarded many prizes, among them the Bank Street College Best Children’s Books for Here Comes the Easter Cat and Here Comes Santa Cat (2015), the Nati per Leggere Award for the Italian edition of No (2012), and the Oppenheim Platinum Award for My Little Polar Bear (2009). In 2008, Let’s Play in the Frest While the Wolf is Not Around was nominated for the IBBY Honour List. Rueda’s books have been translated into more than ten languages including English, French, Chinese, Japanese, German, and Danish. SELECTED BIBLIOGRAPHY No. Toronto: Groundwood, 2010. Print. Google Scholar Here Comes the Easter Cat. By Deborah Underwood. New York: Dial Penguin, 2014. Print. Google Scholar Letras robadas [Stolen letters]. Text Triunfo Arciniegas Madrid: Océano Travesía, 2013. Print. Google Scholar Huff & Puff. New York: Abrams Books, 2012. Print. Google Scholar Formas [Shapes]. Madrid: Océano Travesía, 2009. Print. [End Page 21] Google Scholar Copyright © 2016 Bookbird, Inc.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.279
Threshold uncertainty score0.934

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.2790.102

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.334
Teacher spread0.307 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBookbird/Book birdSame topicLiteracy and Educational PracticesFrench-language works237,207