Mulids of Cairo: Sufi Guilds, Popular Celebrations and the ''Roller-Coaster Landscape" of the Resignified City
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In Cairo as the month of Rabi al-Thani begins, each person knows that the mulid or festival of Hussein is imminent. This mulid commemorates the birthday of Hussein, the grandson of the Prophet Muhammad. Fixed on the Islamic lunar calendar, the date of the celebration moves forward approximately ten days each year within the global solar calendar. Organized around the Cairo mosque that is dedicated to the man who is considered a saint by Sufis, this festive celebration brings together residents and pilgrims from the entire country, animating the whole quarter that bears Hussein's name according to rituals of the mulid, recodifying and rhythmically reordering the space. In the context of increasingly heavy-handed attempts by Cairo city police and the national government to close down public space to hugely popular Sufi festivals as a way to repress any large-scale public gathering (particularly after large public protests in Cairo after the 2003 U.S. invasion of Iraq), this chapter sets out to map out the special meanings, practices, and pleasures of the Cairo mulid. Although not expressly political, the mulid does continue to articulate alternative collective urban identities and solidarities, and to overpower conceptual, geographic, and religious attempts to contain it. This chapter offers a reading of ways in which public space in Cairo is created, or at least expressively resignified, during the special circumstances created by these festivals or mulids. These events constitute particular, circumscribed, holy space-time occurrences because they are at once popular festivals and devout pilgrimages.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.016 | 0.009 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.013 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".