MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2300940512 · doi:10.7202/1033080ar

Qu’est-ce qu’une institution psychiatrique ?

2015· article· fr· W2300940512 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Vassilis Kapsambelis

Bibliographic record

VenueFiligrane Écoutes psychothérapiques · 2015
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldPsychology
TopicPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical sciencePsychologyPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Une institution psychiatrique se définit comme un groupe de professionnels de compétences différentes, se réunissant autour du projet d’accueillir et de soigner des personnes ayant des troubles psychiques. Cette définition est examinée dans ses différentes dimensions : groupe, et donc collectif constituant un organisme vivant ; complémentarité ; élaboration d’un ensemble cohérent et sens de la notion de cohérence ; actions communes et objet de cette pulsionnalité collective : le patient ou ses soins. Les questions du lieu de l’institution, et aussi de la nature du trouble psychique, sont également évoquées.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.472
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.008

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.366
Teacher spread0.318 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFiligrane Écoutes psychothérapiquesSame topicPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology ResearchFrench-language works237,207