MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2301031482 · doi:10.1038/npre.2010.4885.1

Early onset preeclampsia is characterized by altered placental lipid metabolism and a premature increase in circulating FABP4

2010· preprint· en· W2301031482 on OpenAlexafffund
Victor K. M. Han, Gilles Lajoie, Jennifer Ballard, Aaron Booy, Nicholas J. Carruthers, Delfina Siroen

Bibliographic record

VenueNature Precedings · 2010
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPregnancy and preeclampsia studies
Canadian institutionsNature Conservancy of CanadaWestern University
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsPreeclampsiaPlacentaEndocrinologyInternal medicineFatty acid-binding proteinGestationMedicinePregnancyProteinuriaFetusFatty acidChemistryBiologyBiochemistryKidney

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Preeclampsia is a pregnancy-associated disorder that manifests as a sudden increase in maternal blood pressure accompanied by proteinuria. Because the placenta is a key organ in preeclampsia, we used proteomic and lipidomic analyses to compare placentae from preeclamptic and gestational age matched control pregnancies. Fatty acid binding protein 4 (FABP4), enoyl-CoA dehydrogenase and delta-3,5-delta-2,4-dienoyl-CoA isomerase had altered abundance in preeclamptic placentae compared to controls. FABP4 placental protein and RNA and plasma levels were all increased in early-onset preeclampsia (prior to 28 weeks gestation) compared to controls (6-fold, 3.3-fold and 3.5-fold respectively). After 28 weeks, FABP4 protein in control placenta and plasma increased to the same concentrations as in preeclampsia. Total tetracosapentaenoic acid in preeclamptic placentae was decreased to 0.6 of control levels before 28 weeks. The data indicate a disruption of fatty acid transport and metabolism in the placenta in early onset preeclampsia that is reflected in the maternal plasma.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2010
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNature PrecedingsSame topicPregnancy and preeclampsia studiesFrench-language works237,207