MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2301228655 · doi:10.1586/14779072.2016.1164034

Evaluation of syncope: focus on diagnosis and treatment of neurally mediated syncope

2016· review· en· W2301228655 on OpenAlexaff
Andrea K.Y. Lee, Andrew D. Krahn

Bibliographic record

VenueExpert Review of Cardiovascular Therapy · 2016
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic Disorders
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSyncope (phonology)MedicineVasovagal syncopeCerebral hypoperfusionCardiologyPopulationMedical historyInternal medicineIntensive care medicinePerfusion

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Syncope, defined as a transient loss of consciousness secondary to global cerebral hypoperfusion, is common in the general population. The single most helpful "test" in the evaluation of patients with syncope is a thoughtful history, with recent evidence that structured histories are remarkably effective in arriving at a diagnosis. In addition to the history, physical examination, and electrocardiogram, arriving at a diagnosis of syncope can involve monitoring and provocative strategies. The majority of patients with syncope have neurally mediated syncope and a favourable prognosis. The management of neurally mediated syncope continues to largely revolve around education, avoidance of triggers, reassurance, and counter-pressure maneuvers. The evidence surrounding medical therapy in vasovagal syncope is not strong to date. Pacemaker therapy is reasonable in older patients with recurrent, unpredictable syncope with pauses, but should be considered as a last resort in younger patients.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.951
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0090.010
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.070
GPT teacher head0.369
Teacher spread0.300 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations17
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueExpert Review of Cardiovascular TherapySame topicCardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic DisordersFrench-language works237,207