Post-basic baccalaureate nursing education : the nurses' experience
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to understand the meaning of the post-basic baccalaurate nursing education experience through the nurses' eyes. Ten nurses described the experience during their first year of being enrolled as a full time student at one Canadian university. Twenty two sessions were completed which were composed of three sessions with each of the first six nurses and one session with each of the remaining four nurses. The researcher kept notes regarding the sessions which added to the descriptions of the experiences. Thematic analysis of the data suggests that the experience is a journey that is embarked on to satisfy a personal need of accomplishment and the degree, itself, is seen as a possible means to the nurse's future. The experience took the form of a journey and for the informants it was the fulfillment of a long standing dream to attend university. The vision of the experience included the nurse's expectations for the experience and for their own performance in the experience. The experience was a game of survival. The nurses were constantly trying to incorporate the university experience into their lives. The worth of the experience was questioned and remained in question throughout the study. The nurses remained hopeful that the experience would be worthwhile in helping them accomplish their goal of being able to make a difference in the future.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.011 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".