MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2301383301 · doi:10.14288/1.0058339

Stabilization of export proceeds in Tropical Africa

2011· article· en· W2301383301 on OpenAlexaff
Edward Brian Egner

Bibliographic record

VenuecIRcle (University of British Columbia) · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicGlobal trade and economics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTropicsGeographyInternational tradeBusinessFisheryBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study contains an attempt to define and analyse the elusive concept of "stabilization"' in its application to the export production of countries in Africa south of the Sahara. The writer has found it hard to place his analysis in a specifically African context. This difficulty arose partly from the lack of data and the paucity of general reference works based upon African economic conditions. But it was also due to his desire to treat the subject of stabilization against a broad background of the social and economic factors which typically bear upon policy-making in Africa. The Introduction contains a methodological discussion of the means by which an economic analysis might take explicit notice of African social, political and administrative conditions. The conclusion is reached that it is impossible to blend all these factors into one analysis. The primarily non-economic background material is therefore consigned to Chapters I and II, with the discussion of the main theme following in Chapters III and IV. Chapter I contains five numbered sections. (l) The reader is introduced to the newly-independent 'Country X', an expositional device for lending coherence to material drawn from several different African countries. (2) Under the heading 'Political Factors’ there is a discussion of Pan-Africanism and of the "Mobilization' form of political organization. (3) Under 'Social Factors', there are brief outlines of several representative social problems, followed by an interpretation of the economic rationales underlying the 'hoarding' of cattle and the 'extended family system'. (4) Under 'Public Administration’ are discussed standards of morality in public affairs and the need for eliminating bureaucratic rigidities. (5) The summary points to the "confused and confusing" general situation in "X", and enjoins caution and a "piecemeal" approach to the application of economic theory. Emphasis is placed upon the social disruption which inevitably attends economic development of primitive societies. In Chapter II, to illustrate the importance of social and political factors in economic policymaking, there are brief reviews of three questions. (l) The use of psychological indoctrination to speed economic development. (2) The prospects for comprehensive planning in the light of the physical and conceptual difficulties experienced in compiling statistics. (3) The "export-bias" doctrine, Hlla Myint's refutation, and his alternative formulation. The conclusions are broadly similar to those of Chapter I. Chapter III analyses the case for a general international commodity price stabilization scheme. Following a review of the supply and demand factors responsible for the present pattern of international trade, it is concluded (a) that such a stabilization scheme would be administratively, politically and economically unworkable. (b) that the proposal is essentially one for achieving disguised income transfers from rich to poor countries, and (c) that stabilization of producer prices can equally well be achieved by domestic action. The discussion of domestic stabilization policy in Chapter IV centers upon the marketing of Ghana cocoa. The ambiguities of stabilization, which may refer to different periods of time, and to either prices, money incomes or real incomes are fully discussed. The effect of low prices upon production incentives is treated at length, as is the use of the stabilization authority to extract "forced savings" from peasant producers. The conclusion is generally in favour of national stabilization schemes, provided their objectives are strictly defined. Chapter V summarizes the conclusions already set out for the preceding chapters.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.021
Threshold uncertainty score0.041

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.154
Teacher spread0.106 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuecIRcle (University of British Columbia)→Same topicGlobal trade and economics→French-language works237,207→