MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2301392112 · doi:10.14800/ccm.1216

Effects of Neonicotinoids on Promoter-Specific Expression and Activity of Aromatase: Implications for the Development of Hormone-Dependent Breast Cancer

2016· article· en· W2301392112 on OpenAlexafffund
Élyse Caron-Beaudoin, J. Thomas Sanderson

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Cell & Microenvironment · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicInsect and Pesticide Research
Canadian institutionsInstitut National de la Recherche Scientifique
FundersFonds de recherche du Québec – Nature et technologiesUniversitaire StichtingNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCalifornia Breast Cancer Research Program
KeywordsAromataseBreast cancerHormoneBiologyCancerCancer researchInternal medicineEndocrinologyMedicineGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Aromatase (CYP19) is the key enzyme in the biosynthesis of estrogens.In humans, it is expressed in a tissue-and promoter-specific manner.In hormone-dependent breast cancer, CYP19 is overexpressed through the activation of several additional promoters (PII, I.3 and I.7) that are normally inactive in the healthy mammary gland.In the normal mammary gland, low basal CYP19 expression is regulated by the I.4 promoter, which is also active in adipose tissue.Here, we highlight our recent study of the effects of neonicotinoid pesticides on the promoter-specific expression of CYP19 in various human in vitro models.We also discuss the implications of endocrine disruption by environmental chemicals for the development of hormone-dependent diseases, such as breast cancer.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer Cell & MicroenvironmentSame topicInsect and Pesticide ResearchFrench-language works237,207