Oxytocin decreases diurnal and nocturnal arterial blood pressure in the conscious unrestrained spontaneously hypertensive rat
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this study, we assessed the effects of oxytocin (OT) on mean arterial blood pressure (MAP), heart rate (HR), and locomotor activity (LA) in male spontaneous hypertensive rats (SHR) and Sprague-Dawley (SDR) controls using telemetry. OT was given by intravenous injections of 0.1, 0.2 or 0.4mg/kg to assess short term acute effects or by daily subcutaneous injections of 0.5 or 1.0mg/kg for 5 days. Compared to the saline infusion, (i) intravenous OT, regardless of concentration, increased MAP in SHR and SDR, (ii) HR increased, but was periodically lower in both strains with 0.2 or 0.4mg/kg, and (iii) no effects of OT on LA were observed. Subcutaneous injections demonstrated that (i) 1.0mg/kg for 5days lowered diurnal MAP and HR in SDR and SHR, persisting for 6 days, (ii) 1.0mg/kg decreased nocturnal HR in SDR, (iii) 0.5 and 1.0mg/kg decreased MAP with minor effects on HR in the SHR, and lastly (iv) OT decreased LA mainly during the diurnal cycle in both strains. Our main results show that OT induces significant beneficial effects on cardiovascular function over several diurnal and nocturnal cycles in the SHR, with the most prominent effect being a robust decrease in MAP.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it