Modelo de treinamento das Bottegas Renascentistas utilizado na empresa para a formação de jovens iniciantes no trabalho<br>Bottegas of Renaissance training model used in the company to the training of young beginners at work
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Nos dias de hoje deparamo-nos com o choque de gerações no ambiente de trabalho. O jovem não chega preparado para o trabalho, então, precisamos formá-lo. O desenvolvimento do tema nos remeteu ao movimento Humanista e Renascentista. Com o apoio das obras do filósofo e cientista Antonio Meneghetti, baseados em alguns dos conceitos por este autor trabalhados, propomos um projeto para treinamento de jovens com primeira oportunidade de trabalho, ao qual denominamos: Bottega Feira de Calçados. A intenção não é definir um método definitivo, mas propor um programa de treinamento com o objetivo de despertar no jovem a vontade de construir a si mesmo e conscientizá-lo do seu papel na sociedade e em primeiro lugar, para si mesmo, enfocando o valor ontológico do trabalho.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.022 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".