MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

World War I and empire

2016· other· en· W2301758391 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Paul Mulvey

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Encyclopedia of Empire · 2016
Typeother
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicWorld Wars: History, Literature, and Impact
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsColonialismEmpireDecolonizationNationalismAncient historyBritish EmpireFront (military)HistoryWorld War IIEconomic historySpanish Civil WarFirst world warPolitical scienceGeographyLawArchaeologyPolitics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract World War I, while mainly fought in Europe, was also a global war with military action in Asia, the Pacific, and Africa. It involved the three largest colonial empires of the time. Germany's colonial empire was dismembered, while Berlin attempted to disrupt the British Empire. France recruited significant numbers of colonial troops to serve on the Western Front, while Britain not only used Canadian, Australian, Indian, New Zealander, and South African troops in Europe, but also conquered Iraq and Palestine with a mostly Indian army. As well as men, the colonial empires of Britain and France also contributed money and material to the war effort. The French and British empires grew in size as a result of the war, but were left weaker than before due to the costs of the war on the home countries and growing nationalism in the colonies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.058

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.007
Science and technology studies0.0020.004
Scholarly communication0.0070.003
Open science0.0000.003
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0170.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.292
Teacher spread0.279 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Encyclopedia of EmpireSame topicWorld Wars: History, Literature, and ImpactFrench-language works237,207