MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2301779917

Sex differences in conjugal homicide

2009· article· pt· W2301779917 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Lucienne Martins Borges

Bibliographic record

VenueEstudos e Pesquisas em Psicologia · 2009
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHomicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHomicidePsychologyIntimate partnerDomestic violenceCriminologySuicide preventionPoison controlMedicineMedical emergency
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Conjugal homicide refers to homicide in which the victim and the perpetrator were, or had been at some time, legally married, in a common-law relationship, or in a durable intimate relationship. This study seeks to provide a deeper understanding of the perpetrator of conjugal homicide, with particular regard to sex differences in the aggressor, in a sample of participants having committed conjugal homicide in Quebec, Canada, between 1986 and 2000. It was possible to establish a profile of men and of women that had killed their conjugal partner. Several variables pertinent to the understanding and prevention of conjugal homicide were identified, including conjugal violence, alcohol abuse, as well as psychological and psychopathological disorders.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.079
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.300
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEstudos e Pesquisas em PsicologiaSame topicHomicide, Infanticide, and Child AbuseFrench-language works237,207