Effects of moderate‐intensity physical exercise on pharmacokinetics of factor <scp>VIII</scp> and von Willebrand factor in young adults with severe haemophilia A: a pilot study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: In persons with severe haemophilia A (pwshA), infused factor VIII (FVIII) half-life can vary according to such determinants as blood group, von Willebrand factor (VWF) level or age; however, FVIII pharmacokinetics (PK) has not been well studied in pwshA during exercise. AIM: To investigate FVIII PK in pwshA performing moderate-intensity aerobic exercise. METHODS: Twelve young-adult pwshA with the intron-22 inversion mutation, on relatively low-dose FVIII prophylaxis regimens, and relatively good musculoskeletal status were recruited. Abbreviated PK of FVIII activity and von Willebrand factor antigen (VWF:Ag) level were compared - during rest, and with 60-min exercise (2 × 15 min each of moderate-intensity stationary cycling and treadmill walking). During rest and exercise visits, a baseline blood specimen was drawn, routine prophylaxis FVIII infused; then six blood specimens were taken over the following 24 h. RESULTS: For all subjects, mean half-life of infused FVIII did not change significantly with exercise vs. at rest (577 ± 190 vs. 614 ± 163 min; P = 0.4131). VWF:Ag rose transiently by 40-50% for 6-8 h with exercise (P < 0.01), particularly in non-O blood group subjects. No musculoskeletal bleeds occurred during the study. CONCLUSION: Four × 15 min of moderate-intensity aerobic exercise increased VWF:Ag levels for 6-8 h, and showed no evidence of accelerated FVIII clearance or of musculoskeletal bleeding in these young-adult pwshA with relatively good musculoskeletal status, on relatively low-dose FVIII prophylaxis regimens. However, O blood group impact would merit larger studies, with longer durations of similar or more vigorous exercise intensities.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".