Bibliographic record
Abstract
Gastric variceal bleeding is an uncommon, serious complication of portal hypertension. The significant morbidity and mortality resulting from bleeding from gastric varices presents a challenge for gastroenterologists. The management of this complication has not been standardized. Although transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) is used in many centres to treat gastric varices, endoscopic treatment with the tissue glue cyanoacrylate (N-butyl-2-cyanoacrylate) has been used successfully in many countries for 20 years and is considered, by many clinicians, to be the optimal initial treatment for bleeding gastric varices (1). Despite the widespread use of cyanoacrylate, there are still controversies in the literature regarding its use. The present article deals with the indications, technique, preparation, catheter use, long-term results and cost-effectiveness of the procedure. Close attention to these recommendations can result in successful and safe usage of the tissue glue. The endoscopy unit planning to perform gastric variceal glueing should have a detailed nursing protocol established before performing this procedure.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".