MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2302075694 · doi:10.1177/229255030201000402

Bilateral thigh and calf compartment syndromes following elective surgery: Case report and review of the literature

2002· article· en· W2302075694 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Omar Bengezi, Ra Ogilvie, James R. Bain

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Plastic Surgery · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMuscle and Compartmental Disorders
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCompartment (ship)Compartment SyndromesAnesthesiaMethylphenidateSurgeryAttention deficit hyperactivity disorderAnalgesicPsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Bilateral thigh and calf compartment syndromes are rare in pediatric patients, especially following elective foot surgery. Such a case in a child with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder is described in the present report. This child was taking multiple medications, including Ritalin (methylphenidate hydrochloride), Paxil (paroxetine hydrochloride) and clonidine. Other factors that potentially contribute to the multiple compartment syndromes include pneumatic tourniquet use and caudal block augmentation of general anesthesia. Behaviour associated with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder complicated the detection of the patient's compartment syndromes. The development of the compartment syndromes was delayed more than 48 h on one side. The potential for this patient's pharmacotherapy to have contributed to the development of the compartment syndromes is discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0030.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2002
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Plastic SurgerySame topicMuscle and Compartmental DisordersFrench-language works237,207