Sodium Conversion of Oilsands Bitumen-Derived Asphaltenes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Alkali metals are strong electron donors and can form electron donor–acceptor ion pairs with multinuclear aromatics. Single electron donation converts the aromatic into a radial ion, and two electron donations convert the aromatic into a dianion. The anionic aromatic species are more susceptible to reductive addition reactions, such as hydrogen transfer from more hydrogen-rich molecules, such as employed in Birch reduction. The conversion of heavy oils in the presence of alkali metals is claimed to be capable of bulk desulfurization with little hydrogen consumption. In this work, the conversion of oilsands bitumen asphaltenes with sodium was investigated over the temperature range of 60–250 °C under an inert atmosphere to limit the contribution of thermal conversion. Control experiments conducted with asphaltenes without sodium revealed that the asphaltenes were reactive on their own, and the nature of products was affected by the phase behavior of the asphaltenes that gradually changed from a solid to liquid between 124 and 142 °C. When fluidity was limited, intermolecular hydrogen transfer was restricted; intramolecular hydrogen disproportionation and “in cage” intermolecular reactions resulted in the formation of more condensed and potentially more aromatic products. Sodium markedly affected the natural hydrogen transfer and disproportionation. Conversion of the asphaltenes with sodium did not result in an increased maltene yield, but the maltenes had a higher hydrogen/carbon ratio, less sulfur, and less nitrogen. Model compound reactions were employed to study the influence of the reaction atmosphere (N 2 or H 2 ) and hydrogen donor properties of the organic matrix. In the presence of H 2, the formation and reaction of NaH appeared to influence selectivity and the reaction network. In the absence of H 2, desulfurization of thiophenic compounds by sodium proceeded by hydrogenolysis and hydrogenation pathways, with the hydrogenolysis pathway being favored by the lack of hydrogen donor molecules. It was also found that hydrogenolysis of the carbon–carbon bond in the thiophenic ring of dibenzothiophene is reversible.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".