MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2302222014

Integrating human resource management (hrm) into library and information science curriculum of bangladesh

2010· article· en· W2302222014 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Nafiz Zaman Shuva

Bibliographic record

VenueGyankosh- The Journal of Library and Information Management · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicLibrary Science and Information Literacy
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCurriculumHuman resource managementBachelorContext (archaeology)Human resourcesLibrary scienceKnowledge managementPerformance appraisalEngineeringManagementPolitical scienceSociologyPedagogyComputer scienceGeography
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The present study describes that human resources management can be integrated into the exiting LIS curriculum of Bangladesh actually in any LIS curriculum around the world. The core purpose of the study is to present the existing HRM course of LIS programs at the master level in Bangladesh with a view to integrate HRM in the existing curriculum. The study reviews the literature related to LIS education and curriculum in Bangladesh. A comprehensive study was conducted on the existing HRM curriculum concentration of LIS departments in Bangladesh. An attempt has made to find the HRM course content and concentration of some leading LIS schools/departments in USA, UK and Canada. The study found that personnel management is discussed at the Bachelor and Master level of LIS program in Bangladesh but very briefly. Analysing the Human Resources Management course of DILL it is found that during the curriculum development concentration and importance should be given to integrate course content like organizational context of HRM, strategic HRM, change management, recruitment, job analysis, satisfaction, time management, performance appraisal and HRM in the context of digital libraries.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScholarly communication
Consensus categoriesScholarly communication
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.924
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.288
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGyankosh- The Journal of Library and Information ManagementSame topicLibrary Science and Information LiteracyFrench-language works237,207