Bibliographic record
Abstract
Le volume contient les copies manuscrites, les photographies et les etudes de toutes les tablettes mathematiques et metrologiques de la collection Hilprecht de Iena (a l'exception du texte astronomico-mathematique dit texte de Hilprecht HS 245). L'etude des textes mathematico-metrologiques par l'historienne des mathematiques Christine Proust repose sur des travaux preparatoires accomplis par Joachim Oelsner pendant plusieurs annees. Dans cette edition sont inclus les extraits lexicaux et litteraires conserves sur plusieurs tablettes (etudies par Manfred Krebernik). Les tablettes proviennent, autant que l'on puisse en apporter la preuve, de Nippur et remontent pour l'essentiel a la periode babylonienne ancienne (1ere moitie du 2eme millenaire avant J. C.). Concernant deux textes du 3e millenaire, deja publies anterieurement, la nouvelle edition offre une synthese et une actualisation de la recherche effectuee jusqu'a present. Les autres textes sont, pour la plupart, publies pour la premiere fois. Dans une introduction detaillee, le corpus est presente et analyse du point de vue historique, mettant au jour de nouveaux aspects de la formation des scribes dans la periode babylonienne ancienne ainsi que le role des mathematiques au sein de ce cursus. Une reconstruction de toutes les tablettes mathematiques, un glossaire des termes mathematiques ainsi qu'un index des termes attestes dans les passages non mathematiques completent le volume.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.005 | 0.008 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.139 | 0.056 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".