MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Tablettes mathématiques de la collection Hilprecht

2015· article· fr· W2302222375 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Christine Proust

Bibliographic record

VenueAestimatio Sources and Studies in the History of Science · 2015
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicAncient Near East History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Le volume contient les copies manuscrites, les photographies et les etudes de toutes les tablettes mathematiques et metrologiques de la collection Hilprecht de Iena (a l'exception du texte astronomico-mathematique dit texte de Hilprecht HS 245). L'etude des textes mathematico-metrologiques par l'historienne des mathematiques Christine Proust repose sur des travaux preparatoires accomplis par Joachim Oelsner pendant plusieurs annees. Dans cette edition sont inclus les extraits lexicaux et litteraires conserves sur plusieurs tablettes (etudies par Manfred Krebernik). Les tablettes proviennent, autant que l'on puisse en apporter la preuve, de Nippur et remontent pour l'essentiel a la periode babylonienne ancienne (1ere moitie du 2eme millenaire avant J. C.). Concernant deux textes du 3e millenaire, deja publies anterieurement, la nouvelle edition offre une synthese et une actualisation de la recherche effectuee jusqu'a present. Les autres textes sont, pour la plupart, publies pour la premiere fois. Dans une introduction detaillee, le corpus est presente et analyse du point de vue historique, mettant au jour de nouveaux aspects de la formation des scribes dans la periode babylonienne ancienne ainsi que le role des mathematiques au sein de ce cursus. Une reconstruction de toutes les tablettes mathematiques, un glossaire des termes mathematiques ainsi qu'un index des termes attestes dans les passages non mathematiques completent le volume.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.705
Threshold uncertainty score0.974

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.028
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.086
GPT teacher head0.301
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAestimatio Sources and Studies in the History of ScienceSame topicAncient Near East HistoryFrench-language works237,207