MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2302515570

Technology : the force that constructs reality

2005· article· en· W2302515570 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Janine Smit

Bibliographic record

VenueManagement today/Management Today · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicLeadership and Management in Organizations
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSociologyManagementMarketingBusinessEconomics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Extracted from text ... Technology: the force that constructs reality 44 Management Today August 2005 MMarketers have traditionally focused on finding out what customers want and giving it to them. Adhering to this basic marketing concept, however, is the reason why marketing sometimes gets new products wrong, according to marketing expert, Prof Leyland Pitt. Even Bill Gates was guilty of this when he pronounced in 1981 that 640K ought to be enough for everybody. Prof Pitt, an alumnus of the University of Pretoria's Graduate School of Management, is a professor of marketing at Simon Fraser University, Vancouver, Canada and a senior research fellow ..

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.999
Threshold uncertainty score0.232

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0050.006
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0060.006
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0690.035

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueManagement today/Management TodaySame topicLeadership and Management in OrganizationsFrench-language works237,207