MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2302616542 · doi:10.1093/pch/19.8.401

Case 1: A premature infant with stridor

2014· article· en· W2302616542 on OpenAlexaff
Dustin Jacobson, Shawn Hollinger, Jennifer Seelisch, Maxwell Sauder, Johnna MacCormick, Emanuela Ferretti

Bibliographic record

VenuePaediatrics & Child Health · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTracheal and airway disorders
Canadian institutionsUniversity of OttawaChildren's Hospital of Eastern OntarioMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineRespiratory distressStridorDuctus arteriosusSurgeryAnesthesiaChest radiographMechanical ventilationLesionAirway

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A male infant was delivered at 28 weeks and one day gestation by emergency Caesarean section to a gravida 1 mother with pre-eclampsia and HELLP (hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes and low platelets) syndrome. In early life, he had symptoms of respiratory distress, presumably due to respiratory distress syndrome, and was promptly intubated with surfactant administered. Other comorbidities included hyperbilirubinemia, which was treated with a short course of phototherapy; ventilator-associated pneumonia, treated with cloxacillin and gentamicin; and a small patent ductus arteriosus, treated with indomethacin. All of these issues resolved with treatment. Subsequently, the infant underwent several unsuccessful trials of extubation but, on day of life 19, was extubated to noninvasive ventilation. He was started on caffeine to treat apnea of prematurity. The baby appeared well; however, there was a red, demarcated, mammillated oval plaque on the anterior neck. According to the parents, the lesion had increased in size over the previous days to weeks.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0050.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePaediatrics & Child HealthSame topicTracheal and airway disordersFrench-language works237,207