MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2302763597 · doi:10.4312/keria.7.1.117-129

Demostenes: Tretji govor proti Filipu (prevod)

2005· article· sl· W2302763597 on OpenAlexaff
Matjaž Babič

Bibliographic record

VenueKeria Studia Latina et Graeca · 2005
Typearticle
Languagesl
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicByzantine Studies and History
Canadian institutionsDiscovery Air (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsMolecular biologyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

S tem govorom, tretjo izmed štirih znamenitih 'filipik' (Φιλιπικ̀ι λόγοι, lat. Orationes Philippicae), je Demosten nastopil na zasedanju ljudske skupščine leta 341. Tistega leta je tudi večini prej mlačnih Atencem postajalo jasno, da Filipu II. ne bo dovolj oblast nad severno Grčijo, ki si jo je bil pridobil deloma z vojsko, deloma s spletkarjenjem in podkupovanjem, temveč da si namerava podjarmiti celotno celinsko in otoško deželo. V govoru Demostenes opozarja, da Filip posredno in neposredno krši mirovno pogodbo, sklenjeno med njim in Atenami leta 346 (t. i. 'Filokratov mir'), graja neodločne člane atenske skupščine, ki še vedno preveč popuščajo Filipovim pristašem, in zahteva od njih, naj se čimprej pripravijo na odločilni spopad z Makedonci ter naj zanj med Grki pridobijo čimveč zaveznikov.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.863
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueKeria Studia Latina et GraecaSame topicByzantine Studies and HistoryFrench-language works237,207