MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2302952300 · doi:10.1101/044859

FOSSIL CALIBRATIONS FOR THE ARTHROPOD TREE OF LIFE

2016· preprint· en· W2302952300 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2016
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicFossil Insects in Amber
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversity of OxfordSimons Foundation
KeywordsArthropodEcologyBiologyTree of life (biology)Molecular clockEvolutionary biologyPaleontologyGeographyPhylogenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT Fossil age data and molecular sequences are increasingly combined to establish a timescale for the Tree of Life. Arthropods, as the most species-rich and morphologically disparate animal phylum, have received substantial attention, particularly with regard to questions such as the timing of habitat shifts (e.g. terrestrialisation), genome evolution (e.g. gene family duplication and functional evolution), origins of novel characters and behaviours (e.g. wings and flight, venom, silk), biogeography, rate of diversification (e.g. Cambrian explosion, insect coevolution with angiosperms, evolution of crab body plans), and the evolution of arthropod microbiomes. We present herein a series of rigorously vetted calibration fossils for arthropod evolutionary history, taking into account recently published guidelines for best practice in fossil calibration. These are restricted to Palaeozoic and Mesozoic fossils, no deeper than ordinal taxonomic level, nonetheless resulting in 80 fossil calibrations for 102 clades. This work is especially timely owing to the rapid growth of molecular sequence data and the fact that many included fossils have been described within the last five years. This contribution provides a resource for systematists and other biologists interested in deep-time questions in arthropod evolution. ABBREVIATIONS AMNH American Museum of Natural History AMS Australian Museum, Sydney AUGD University of Aberdeen BGR Bundesanstalt fur Geowissenschaften und Rohstoffe, Berlin BMNH The Natural History Museum, London CNU Key Laboratory of Insect Evolutionary &amp; Environmental Change, Capital Normal University, Beijing DE Ulster Museum, Belfast ED Ibaraki University, Mito, Japan FMNH Field Museum of Natural History GMCB Geological Museum of China, Beijing GSC Geological Survey of Canada IRNSB Institut Royal des Sciences Naturelles de Belgique, Brussels KSU Kent State University Ld Musee Fleury, Lodeve, France LWL Landschaftsverband Westfalen-Lippe-Museum fur Naturkunde, Munster MACN Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales, Buenos Aires MBA Museum fur Naturkunde, Berlin MCNA Museo de Ciencias Naturales de Alava, Vitoria-Gasteiz, Alava, Spain MCZ Museum of Comparative Zoology, Harvard University MGSB Museo Geologico del Seminario de Barcelona MN Museu Nacional, Rio de Janeiro MNHN Museum national d'Histoire naturelle, Paris NHMUK The Natural History Museum, London NIGP Nanjing Institute of Geology and Palaeontology NMS National Museum of Scotland OUM Oxford University Museum of Natural History PBM Palaobotanik Munster PIN Paleontological Institute, Moscow PRI Paleontological Research Institution, Ithaca ROM Royal Ontario Museum SAM South Australian Museum, Adelaide SM <jats:de

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.654
Threshold uncertainty score0.503

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it