Microfluidic Approaches for Manipulation and Assemblyof One‐Dimensional Nanomaterials
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This chapter focuses on the process of one-dimensional (1D) nanomaterials assembly assisted by shear force of microflow, that is, the microflow-assisted or microfluidic 1D nanomaterial manipulation and assembly. It specifically focuses on the recent advances that are able to realize precise control of density, width, and location of assembled nanowires (NWs) array through combination of both fluidic shear force within the well-designed microfluidic channels and the mechanism of hydrodynamic focusing (HF). The chapter reviews a recent advance in this area that is able to precisely position a single NW onto predetermined locations with designated orientation using the mechanism of HF, which acts as microfluidic "hydro-tweezers" to ensure parallel NWs assembly and scalable integration of NW-based devices. It provides a brief introduction on present NWs assembly routes and focuses on one promising microfluidic assembly technique that utilizes the mechanism of HF.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it