MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Influence of crop growth and weather variables on soil CO2 emissions in a maize-wheat cropping system

2015· article· en· W2303008318 on OpenAlexaff
H. S. Dhadli, B. S. Brar, T. Andrew Black

Bibliographic record

VenueAgricultural Research Journal · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicSoil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAgronomyCropEnvironmental scienceCropping systemCroppingGrowing seasonFertilizerSoil waterField experimentBiologyAgricultureSoil science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Effect of crop growth and weather variables on temporal variations in soil CO2 emissions in the maize and wheat crop seasons, from N-fertilized soils and without any fertilizer input, were studied in a field experiment. CO2 fluxes were estimated using closed chambers and gas chromatography. Daily CO2 fluxes varied from 4.7 to 9.4 CO2-C ha-1day-1 in the maize crop season and 2.4 to 6.4 CO2-C ha-1day-1 in the wheat crop season. Total emissions during vegetative stages were higher as compared to other stages, for both maize and wheat crops. Study revealed that seasonal fluctuations in CO2 fluxes were controlled by soil moisture and temperature, and when these were optimum, emissions were also related to N-fertilization.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.946
Threshold uncertainty score0.271

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.293
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAgricultural Research JournalSame topicSoil Carbon and Nitrogen DynamicsFrench-language works237,207