MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2303369708 · doi:10.1136/oemed-2015-103104

Potentially modifiable risk factors for mental health problems in deployed UK maritime forces

2015· letter· en· W2303369708 on OpenAlexaff
David Boulos, Mark A. Zamorski

Bibliographic record

VenueOccupational and Environmental Medicine · 2015
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicPosttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of OttawaCanadian Armed Forces
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMental healthEnvironmental healthRisk analysis (engineering)BusinessMedicinePsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Military deployments and mental health problems (MHPs) have often been studied, but only infrequently in the deployed environment, where MHP-related impairments would be particularly consequential. Fewer still have looked at deployed sailors, so Whybrow et al 's1 cross-sectional survey of MHPs among Royal Navy personnel deployed at sea is a welcome addition to the literature. They found that 41.2% had common mental disorder symptoms (ie, mood, anxiety or neurotic spectrum disorders), 7.8% probable post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), and 17.4% potentially harmful alcohol use. These prevalence rates are strikingly higher than those in deployed UK land-based forces using comparable methods; common mental disorder rates varied from 16.0% to 20.8% and probable PTSD from 1.9% to 3.4%.2 3 An earlier study of deployed Royal Navy personnel documented similarly elevated rates, suggesting that the present findings are not a chance occurrence.4 Past research has focused on operational trauma as the primary driver of poor mental health in military personnel, both on deployment and afterwards. The low trauma exposure in the present study suggests other attributions for the high levels of MHPs, such as premilitary characteristics and experiences, …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.029

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0030.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.069
GPT teacher head0.343
Teacher spread0.274 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOccupational and Environmental MedicineSame topicPosttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchFrench-language works237,207