Bibliographic record
Abstract
O livro Obra Breve, de Fiama Hasse Pais Brandão, apresenta a reunião da produção poética realizada pela própria autora. Ela efetiva, como uma de suas marcas singulares, o fato de se deixar transpassar pela linha de força que pode ser descrita como o princípio informe, indefinido e indeterminado, subjacente e comum a todos os objetos, que adquire alguma forma poética em decorrência de sua natureza e da ação expressiva da escrita. Em outras palavras, a obra de Fiama Brandão dialoga intimamente com aspectos filosóficos que tangenciam tanto o platonismo quanto o aristotelismo, no que diz respeito ao entendimento do que venha a ser a matéria e sua expressão literária. Este estudo tem por finalidade apresentar e discutir a face dialógica estabelecida entre filosofia e poesia a partir dos textos de Obra Breve, particularmente, dos livros Matéria (1960- 1965), Homenagemàliteratura (1976) e A matéria simples (2006). Obra Breve, livre d’Fiama Hasse Pais Brandão, presente une réunion de sa production poétique. Ses poèmes sont, de façon singuilière, croisés par une ligne de force indéfinie, indéterminée, sous-jacente et commune à tous les objets qui y sont transformés en matière poétique par sa propre nature et par l’action expressive de l’écriture. En d’autres termes, l’oeuvre de Fiama Brandão dialogue de façon intime avec les reflexions philosophiques à la fois platonique et l’aristotélique, en ce qui concerne la compréhension de la matière et son expression littéraire. Cet étude vise à présenter et discuter le dialogisme établi entre la philosophie et la poésie en Obra Breve, en particulier dans les livres: Matéria (1960-1965), Homenagemàliteratura (1976) et A Matéria Simples (2006).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.009 | 0.018 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.011 | 0.011 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.023 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".