Modulation of Mcm2–7 activity by Cdt1
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Genome duplication occurs once and only once in each cell cycle. During G1 phase, pre‐replicative complexes (pre‐RC), composed of ORC, Cdc6, Cdt1 and Mcm2–7, are assembled at replication origins. Mcm2–7 is the replicative helicase in eukaryotic cells; however, it does not unwind DNA in the pre‐RC. It is only in S‐phase, after activation of Mcm2–7, that DNA unwinding is detected. Cdt1 co‐purifies from yeast cells in a complex with Mcm2–7. Beyond being an escort for entry of Mcm2–7 into the nucleus and into the pre‐RC, the role of Cdt1 in DNA replication is not known. Using purified components from bacterial expression systems, we assembled Mcm2–7•Cdt1 complexes and compared its activity to that of Mcm2–7 alone. We show that Mcm2–7•Cdt1 has lower ATPase activity than Mcm2–7. In addition, DNA unwinding by Mcm2–7•Cdt1 is significantly lower than by Mcm2–7 alone. Furthermore and consistent with published reports, in vitro pre‐RC reconstitution experiments showed loading of Mcm2–7 to origins was dependent on ORC, Cdc6 and Cdt1. Together, the effects of Cdt1 on Mcm2–7 suggest mechanisms by which Cdt1 may carry out its essential role in the initiation of DNA replication. Research funded by CIHR
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".